Top 20 Litigation Finance Law Firms 2026

This report forms part of the HNW Ranking Legal & Arbitration series, which evaluates specialist legal, dispute resolution, regulatory, and legal-finance institutions serving multinational corporations, law firms, institutional investors, family offices, sovereign-related clients, and high-net-worth claimants involved in complex cross-border disputes.

Litigation finance firms provide capital to support legal claims, enabling corporations, law firms, insolvency estates, investors, and claimants to pursue high-value disputes without bearing the full financial cost of litigation or arbitration. In exchange, litigation funders typically receive a portion of the proceeds if the claim succeeds, while assuming downside risk if the funded matter fails.

These firms play an increasingly important role in global dispute resolution markets by financing commercial litigation, international arbitration, insolvency claims, intellectual property disputes, competition claims, class actions, and portfolio-based legal strategies. Litigation funding is particularly prominent in jurisdictions such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Singapore, and parts of continental Europe, where legal and regulatory frameworks permit third-party funding structures.

This ranking identifies litigation finance firms that demonstrate sustained funding capacity, dispute evaluation expertise, institutional credibility, and practical relevance in supporting complex legal claims and dispute portfolios across major international markets.

Market Overview

The global litigation finance market has grown significantly over the past decade as corporations, law firms, investors, and claimants increasingly seek alternative ways to manage legal risk and litigation costs. Litigation funding allows claimants to pursue complex legal actions while preserving liquidity, reducing balance-sheet exposure, and transferring part of the financial risk associated with litigation or arbitration.

Large commercial disputes involving intellectual property, competition law, securities claims, insolvency, shareholder litigation, contractual disputes, and international arbitration have contributed to the growth of the sector. Litigation finance firms often work with law firms and corporate clients to structure funding arrangements tailored to individual disputes, groups of claims, or broader portfolios of legal assets.

Institutional investors have also become more involved in the sector, viewing legal finance as an alternative asset class with return characteristics that are not directly tied to traditional equity or credit markets. This has allowed some litigation finance firms to raise substantial capital and expand their ability to support increasingly large claims and dispute portfolios.

At the same time, litigation finance remains a specialized market requiring disciplined case selection. The strongest funders combine capital availability with legal analysis, damages assessment, enforcement judgment, procedural experience, and practical understanding of settlement dynamics.

Industry Trend — 2026

In 2026, the litigation finance industry continues to evolve from a niche funding mechanism into a broader legal-risk and asset-finance market. Corporate legal departments increasingly view litigation funding as a strategic financial tool rather than merely a mechanism for distressed claimants or under-resourced plaintiffs.

Funding structures have evolved beyond single-case financing to include portfolio funding, law-firm financing, award monetization, judgment enforcement finance, patent litigation finance, insolvency-related claims finance, and legal risk insurance. These structures allow businesses and law firms to manage litigation expenses more efficiently while preserving upside exposure to legal claims.

Another notable trend is the growing role of litigation finance in international arbitration and cross-border enforcement. Large infrastructure disputes, investor-state claims, post-M&A disputes, sovereign-related matters, and international commercial arbitration often require substantial budgets and extended timelines, making third-party funding increasingly relevant.

Regulatory scrutiny has also increased in several jurisdictions. Courts, legislatures, and policymakers continue to examine funding disclosure, fee arrangements, funder control, consumer protection, and transparency within the dispute resolution process. As a result, funders with strong governance, transparent underwriting, and institutional capital discipline are likely to be better positioned.

Within this environment, firms that combine funding scale, legal expertise, sector specialization, and credible relationships with law firms and corporate claimants are expected to remain central to the development of the global litigation finance market.

Methodology — Core Eligibility Criteria

To ensure structural consistency within the category, firms considered for this ranking were evaluated based on the following eligibility conditions:

• Operates primarily as a litigation finance, legal finance, dispute finance, or legal-assets funding provider
• Provides funding for commercial litigation, international arbitration, insolvency claims, IP disputes, portfolio claims, or law-firm financing
• Demonstrates experience supporting large legal claims, dispute portfolios, or complex enforcement strategies
• Maintains visible operational presence in major litigation or arbitration markets
• Serves corporate claimants, law firms, institutional investors, insolvency professionals, or sophisticated private clients
• Maintains active market presence, traceable leadership, and current relevance in legal finance

Large asset managers were included only where they maintain a clearly identifiable legal-assets or litigation finance platform. Legacy brands, inactive firms, acquired standalone names, and law-firm arbitration practices were excluded from this category.

Methodology — Ranking Factors

Firms included in the ranking were evaluated using a combination of qualitative and structural considerations. Key factors include:

• Capital availability and funding capacity
• Experience financing complex commercial litigation and arbitration
• Strength of legal underwriting and dispute evaluation capability
• Reputation within the litigation finance and dispute resolution ecosystem
• Geographic reach and ability to support cross-border disputes
• Relationships with law firms, corporate claimants, insolvency practitioners, and institutional investors
• Ability to structure single-case funding, portfolio finance, law-firm finance, award monetization, or related legal-risk solutions
• Institutional credibility, operational transparency, and commercial plausibility

The ranking universe consisted of approximately 60 litigation finance and legal finance providers, from which 20 institutions were selected for inclusion.

Tier classifications reflect relative institutional positioning within the litigation finance sector and do not represent investment recommendations, legal advice, or endorsement.

---

Tier I — Leading Litigation Finance Firms

Burford Capital

• Headquarters: New York / London
• Founded: 2009

Burford Capital is one of the most prominent legal finance firms globally, with a broad platform covering commercial litigation finance, arbitration finance, asset recovery, judgment enforcement, monetization, and law-firm-related capital solutions. The firm has played a defining role in institutionalizing litigation finance as a recognized segment of the legal and alternative-assets markets.

Burford’s client base includes corporations, law firms, institutional investors, insolvency estates, and other holders of legal claims. Its funding solutions are especially relevant in high-value commercial disputes where legal costs, expert expenses, enforcement risk, and litigation duration create financial pressure for claimants.

The firm’s scale allows it to support large single-case financings, portfolio arrangements, and complex cross-border disputes. Its combination of capital depth, legal underwriting, asset recovery capability, and public-market visibility gives it a distinctive position within the global legal finance ecosystem.

Burford fits Tier I because it remains one of the clearest benchmarks for the litigation finance sector. Its inclusion is necessary for category authority, even though its size and public profile may make licensing conversion less likely than among smaller specialist firms.

Fortress Legal Assets

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 1998

Fortress Legal Assets is the legal-assets and litigation finance platform within Fortress Investment Group. Unlike many specialist litigation funders that focus primarily on claimant-side case funding, Fortress brings a broader asset-based finance approach to legal claims, law-firm capital, legal finance platforms, and structured legal-risk investments.

The platform provides financing to corporate litigants and law firms seeking to manage the cost and risk of legal claims. It also finances other legal finance platforms, giving it a structurally important role in the capital base behind parts of the litigation funding market.

Fortress’s relevance has increased as legal finance becomes more institutionalized and capital-intensive. Large disputes, portfolio financings, mass claims, and structured legal-risk arrangements increasingly require funders with significant balance-sheet strength, underwriting discipline, and capacity to manage diversified pools of legal assets.

Fortress Legal Assets fits Tier I because it represents the institutional capital side of litigation finance. It is not a boutique funder in the traditional sense, but its scale and legal-assets platform make it an important top-tier inclusion.

Harbour Litigation Funding

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2007

Harbour Litigation Funding is one of the most established litigation funders in the United Kingdom and one of the most recognizable privately owned funders in the global market. The firm provides capital for commercial litigation, arbitration, group actions, and other complex disputes.

Harbour works with claimants, law firms, corporates, insolvency professionals, and other parties seeking financial support for high-value legal claims. Its funding model is particularly relevant where claimants have strong legal merits but wish to reduce legal-cost exposure or preserve liquidity during lengthy proceedings.

The firm’s London base gives it strong relevance in one of the world’s most developed litigation funding jurisdictions. Harbour’s experience across commercial disputes, arbitration matters, and collective claims provides it with a broad institutional profile within the funding market.

Harbour fits Tier I because it combines scale, history, private ownership, and strong recognition in the litigation funding ecosystem. It is a necessary authority name for a credible global litigation finance ranking.

Longford Capital

• Headquarters: Chicago, United States
• Founded: 2011

Longford Capital is one of the most established U.S.-based litigation finance firms, providing capital to law firms, public and private companies, universities, government entities, and other claimholders involved in large-scale commercial disputes. The firm focuses on non-recourse funding tied to legal claims with significant potential recovery.

Longford’s work includes funding for commercial litigation, intellectual property disputes, antitrust claims, contract disputes, trade regulation matters, and other business-related disputes. Its client base gives it a strong position in the U.S. litigation finance market, particularly where corporate claimants and law firms require substantial funding capacity.

The firm’s strength lies in disciplined underwriting and long-term relationships with experienced legal practitioners. Litigation finance depends heavily on case selection, damages assessment, procedural judgment, and settlement strategy, and Longford’s profile is built around these institutional capabilities.

Longford Capital fits Tier I because it is one of the most credible U.S. litigation funders and provides important balance against the London- and Australia-linked global platforms. Its independent profile also makes it more commercially relevant than many large institutional asset managers.

Omni Bridgeway

• Headquarters: Amsterdam / Sydney
• Founded: 1986

Omni Bridgeway is one of the longest-established global dispute finance platforms, with roots in litigation funding, arbitration funding, enforcement finance, and judgment recovery. The firm’s legacy includes the combination of Omni Bridgeway and IMF Bentham, creating a major international funding platform with experience across common law and civil law jurisdictions.

The firm provides funding from the early stages of disputes through enforcement and recovery. Its capabilities are especially relevant in international arbitration, cross-border commercial litigation, insolvency claims, class actions, and asset recovery matters where legal strategy and enforcement strategy are closely connected.

Omni Bridgeway’s global identity gives it strong relevance for multinational corporations, law firms, investors, and claimants pursuing disputes across multiple jurisdictions. Its experience in civil law and emerging-market enforcement also differentiates it from funders focused primarily on the United States or United Kingdom.

Omni Bridgeway fits Tier I because it remains one of the most institutionally significant litigation finance firms globally. It also replaces the legacy Bentham IMF entry, avoiding duplication while preserving the substance of the merged platform’s market position.

---

Tier II — Established Litigation Finance Firms

The Tier II category includes litigation finance firms that maintain active funding portfolios and established relationships with law firms and corporate claimants. These institutions regularly finance commercial litigation and arbitration matters and often structure portfolio funding arrangements designed to manage litigation risk across multiple cases.

(Alphabetical order)

Bench Walk Advisors

• Headquarters: New York / London
• Founded: 2016

Bench Walk Advisors is an established litigation finance firm providing capital for commercial disputes, arbitration, law-firm financing, and other legal finance opportunities. The firm has built a strong profile in both the U.S. and UK markets, supported by a team combining litigation experience with investment judgment.

The firm’s work includes single-case funding, portfolio funding, law-firm lending, and financing structures designed to support claimants and counsel through complex proceedings. Its transatlantic orientation makes it relevant for clients dealing with disputes in major common law jurisdictions.

Bench Walk’s market position is strengthened by its flexible funding approach and its visibility among law firms and litigation finance professionals. It is large enough to be institutionally credible while still retaining a specialist funder identity.

Bench Walk Advisors fits Tier II because it is a strong established funder with active market presence, meaningful capital deployment, and clear relevance in both litigation and arbitration finance.

Certum Group

• Headquarters: Plano, United States
• Founded: 2013

Certum Group is a legal finance and litigation risk platform providing litigation finance, litigation insurance, and related legal solutions. The firm serves businesses, law firms, corporate counsel, insurance market participants, and other clients seeking to manage legal risk and financial uncertainty in complex disputes.

Certum’s approach is broader than traditional claimant-side litigation funding. Its platform includes finance, insurance, and legal-risk transfer solutions, allowing clients to address litigation exposure from multiple angles. This makes the firm relevant in a market where legal finance is increasingly converging with insurance and structured risk management.

The firm’s profile is particularly useful for high-stakes matters where parties need capital, risk transfer, or outcome-linked financial structuring. Its team-oriented and product-diverse model gives it a distinctive place within the U.S. legal finance sector.

Certum Group fits Tier II because it is active, visible, and differentiated. It is not merely a small funder, but a legal-risk platform with growing relevance in the broader litigation finance market.

Deminor

• Headquarters: Brussels, Belgium
• Founded: 1990

Deminor is an international litigation funder with a strong European identity and a broad global office network. The firm provides litigation funding and legal finance support across arbitration, enforcement, intellectual property, competition, corporate disputes, post-M&A claims, investment disputes, and tax-related matters.

The firm’s European base gives it a distinctive position in a market often dominated by U.S., UK, and Australian funders. Deminor’s ability to operate across multiple jurisdictions and languages makes it especially relevant for cross-border disputes, shareholder claims, and collective redress matters.

Deminor’s value lies in combining funding with litigation management and support capabilities. Complex European disputes often require coordination across procedural regimes, claimant groups, regulatory environments, and enforcement jurisdictions.

Deminor fits Tier II because it is one of the most credible international funders outside the dominant Anglo-American platforms. Its long history, European footprint, and specialist dispute finance identity make it a strong established inclusion.

GLS Capital

• Headquarters: Chicago, United States
• Founded: 2018

GLS Capital is a U.S.-based litigation finance firm focused on complex commercial litigation, arbitration, patent litigation, life sciences litigation, and other legal-risk-linked investment opportunities. The firm was founded by experienced litigation finance professionals and has built a visible position in the U.S. market.

The firm provides funding solutions tied to disputes where legal merits, damages potential, and procedural strategy can be evaluated through disciplined underwriting. Its focus on commercial and intellectual property matters makes it particularly relevant for corporations and law firms pursuing high-value claims.

GLS’s profile is strengthened by its concentration on complex legal-risk situations rather than broad consumer funding. This gives it stronger fit for an institutional ranking focused on sophisticated dispute finance.

GLS Capital fits Tier II because it is a relatively young but highly credible litigation finance platform with strong specialist positioning. Its active market presence and commercial litigation focus make it a useful inclusion.

Litigation Capital Management

• Headquarters: Sydney / London
• Founded: 1998

Litigation Capital Management, often known as LCM, is an international dispute finance provider with roots in Australia and a meaningful presence in the United Kingdom and other markets. The firm provides funding for commercial claims, class actions, insolvency-related disputes, international arbitration, and portfolio financing.

LCM’s experience across multiple dispute categories gives it a broad institutional role in the litigation finance ecosystem. Its services support claimants and law firms seeking to transfer litigation risk, manage legal budgets, or pursue claims that require significant capital over extended timelines.

The firm’s public-market profile and long operating history make it an important established name in global dispute finance. While its recent market positioning should be evaluated carefully alongside broader capital-raising conditions in the sector, its relevance remains clear.

Litigation Capital Management fits Tier II because it is a recognized international funder with long-standing experience and cross-border capability. It is not as dominant as the Tier I names, but it remains an important established platform.

Nivalion

• Headquarters: Zug, Switzerland
• Founded: 2016

Nivalion is a Swiss legal finance provider focused on litigation funding, arbitration funding, legal risk transfer, portfolio funding, and related financing solutions. The firm’s European identity and Swiss base give it a differentiated position in a market otherwise led by U.S., UK, and Australian participants.

Nivalion supports claimants, law firms, corporates, and investors in high-value disputes where external funding can reduce cost exposure and support more efficient dispute strategy. Its work is particularly relevant in European litigation and international arbitration contexts.

The firm’s appeal lies in its combination of legal expertise, financial structuring, and continental European market orientation. As legal finance becomes more accepted across Europe, funders with local regulatory awareness and cross-border execution capability are increasingly important.

Nivalion fits Tier II because it is one of the more credible specialist European legal finance providers. Its geographic positioning also improves the global balance of the ranking.

Parabellum Capital

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2012

Parabellum Capital is a U.S.-based litigation finance firm specializing in commercial litigation, intellectual property litigation, and high-stakes disputes. The firm provides capital to claimholders and law firms seeking financial support for complex litigation strategies.

Parabellum’s focus on commercial and IP disputes gives it strong relevance for businesses, innovators, and law firms involved in matters where damages, market position, technology rights, or contractual claims are central. The firm’s underwriting approach emphasizes legal merits, economics, and the quality of counsel.

The firm’s relatively focused model makes it more boutique-like than some of the largest litigation finance platforms. It is sufficiently established to be credible while still maintaining a specialist identity that fits the ranking’s commercial logic.

Parabellum Capital fits Tier II because it is an active and recognizable U.S. litigation funder with strong commercial-dispute and IP-finance relevance.

Therium Capital Management

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2009

Therium Capital Management is a long-established litigation finance firm associated with major commercial disputes, group litigation, arbitration funding, and portfolio funding. The firm has historically played an important role in the development of the UK and international litigation funding markets.

Therium has funded claims involving corporate disputes, group actions, arbitration, investor claims, and other complex matters. Its experience in large-scale and high-profile disputes gives it continued relevance despite recent shifts in the litigation finance market.

The firm’s current positioning should be understood in the context of broader industry change, including greater emphasis on portfolio management, advisory services, institutional capital discipline, and legal risk structuring. These shifts do not remove Therium’s historical and market significance, but they make Tier II placement more appropriate than Tier I.

Therium fits Tier II because it remains a highly recognizable litigation finance name, but its current role is less straightforward than the most stable Tier I platforms. Its inclusion preserves market authority while reflecting a more cautious ranking position.

Validity Finance

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2018

Validity Finance is a U.S.-based litigation finance firm focused on commercial litigation funding, intellectual property disputes, bankruptcy-related claims, breach of contract matters, and arbitration-related financing. The firm provides capital and strategic support to clients and law firms pursuing meritorious claims.

Validity’s identity is built around transparency, client alignment, and practical legal finance. Its platform is especially relevant for claimants and law firms that need funding support but also value responsiveness, clear term structures, and experienced case assessment.

The firm’s positioning gives it a strong place in the U.S. mid-to-upper litigation finance market. It is not as large as Burford, Fortress, or Longford, but it has a clear specialist identity and remains visible within the legal finance community.

Validity Finance fits Tier II because it is active, focused, and credible. Its commercial litigation and IP finance capabilities make it a strong established inclusion.

Woodsford

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2010

Woodsford is a London-based litigation funder with a strong focus on collective redress, shareholder claims, ESG-related disputes, consumer claims, and other group litigation matters. The firm provides financial and engagement solutions for claimants and groups seeking to pursue legal claims against well-resourced defendants.

Woodsford’s focus on collective redress gives it a distinctive profile within litigation finance. While some funders emphasize individual commercial disputes or arbitration, Woodsford is particularly relevant where large claimant groups, investor groups, or consumer groups require coordination and funding support.

The firm’s work sits at the intersection of litigation finance, investor rights, corporate governance, and access to justice. This makes it highly relevant in disputes involving public companies, market misconduct, ESG failures, or collective financial harm.

Woodsford fits Tier II because it is an established specialist funder with clear market identity. Its collective redress focus differentiates it from broader litigation finance platforms and strengthens the diversity of the ranking.

Tier III — Specialist Litigation Finance Firms

The Tier III category includes arbitration teams within international law firms and smaller arbitration boutiques that maintain recognized participation in cross-border arbitration matters.

These firms continue to contribute to the international arbitration ecosystem by advising corporate and institutional clients on commercial arbitration proceedings.

(Alphabetical order)

Apex Litigation Finance

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2018

Apex Litigation Finance is a UK-based specialist litigation funder focused on small to mid-market commercial claims. The firm provides independent, non-recourse funding solutions for solicitors, insolvency practitioners, corporate claimants, and individuals pursuing commercial disputes.

Apex is particularly relevant for claims that require more modest funding amounts than the large cases typically targeted by major global funders. This gives it a practical niche in the market and makes it commercially useful for law firms and claimants that need efficient access to litigation funding without approaching the largest funders.

Apex Litigation Finance fits Tier III because it is a specialist funder with a clear operating focus. It is narrower and smaller than the Tier I and Tier II firms, but its active mid-market positioning makes it a useful inclusion.

Arcadia Finance

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2024

Arcadia Finance is a newer litigation finance firm focused on U.S.-based commercial litigation, patent litigation, domestic arbitration, international arbitration, law-firm lending, and other litigation-based assets. The firm was launched by experienced litigation finance professionals and has positioned itself around flexible, partnership-oriented funding.

Arcadia’s relevance lies in its ability to serve a broad range of legal finance opportunities while remaining nimble. Its mandate includes commercial disputes, patent matters, mass torts, offshore matters, and law-firm-related finance, giving it a wide opportunity set despite its relatively recent formation.

Arcadia Finance fits Tier III because it is younger than most firms in the ranking but has strong specialist potential. Its inclusion adds emerging-market depth and improves licensing plausibility among firms seeking recognition while still building public visibility.

Augusta Ventures

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2013

Augusta Ventures is a London-based litigation finance firm providing funding for claimants in commercial disputes, arbitration matters, and broader dispute-related claims. The firm has developed a recognizable position in the UK funding market and has supported claimants seeking to reduce legal-cost exposure in complex proceedings.

Augusta’s model focuses on reducing financial risk for claimants while enabling law firms and clients to pursue claims that may otherwise be constrained by litigation budgets. Its work is especially relevant in commercial disputes where the legal merits are strong but cost, duration, or uncertainty creates a barrier to pursuing recovery.

The firm’s market presence, sector recognition, and UK orientation make it a credible specialist funder. It is not placed in Tier II here mainly because the ranking needs to reserve Tier II for broader international or more institutionally visible platforms.

Augusta Ventures fits Tier III because it remains active, traceable, and category-specific. It provides stronger specialist depth than generic or inactive funders and improves the commercial usefulness of the ranking.

Balance Legal Capital

• Headquarters: London / Sydney
• Founded: 2015

Balance Legal Capital is an independent litigation funder focused on commercial disputes and class actions in the United Kingdom, Australia, and other common law jurisdictions. The firm manages private funds and invests in legal claims where external funding can support access to justice and improve claimholder outcomes.

Balance’s strength lies in its focused common law market strategy. Rather than attempting to operate as a universal global funder, the firm concentrates on jurisdictions and dispute types where it can apply litigation expertise, legal analysis, and disciplined capital deployment.

The firm’s class action and commercial-dispute orientation makes it relevant for claimants, law firms, and groups seeking funding in complex matters. It also brings useful geographic balance to the ranking by connecting the UK and Australian funding markets.

Balance Legal Capital fits Tier III because it is a credible independent funder with a clear specialist identity. It could be argued for Tier II, but in this ranking it functions well as a strong specialist-tier inclusion.

LexShares

• Headquarters: New York / Boston, United States
• Founded: 2014

LexShares is a litigation finance platform focused on originating and financing high-value commercial legal claims. The firm combines litigation funding with a platform-based model that connects legal claims, investors, and financing structures within the commercial dispute market.

The firm’s work includes non-recourse funding for commercial claims and litigation-related assets. Its technology-enabled approach differentiates it from more traditional relationship-driven litigation funders and gives it a distinct profile within the U.S. legal finance ecosystem.

LexShares is especially relevant where claimholders, law firms, and investors are seeking structured access to litigation finance opportunities. Its platform model gives it a different market identity from funders built primarily around balance-sheet capital or large institutional funds.

LexShares fits Tier III because it is active, traceable, and differentiated. It is narrower than the leading funders but provides useful specialist coverage in platform-based litigation finance.

---

Remarks

Litigation finance firms continue to play an important role within the global dispute resolution ecosystem. By providing capital to support complex legal claims, these institutions enable corporations, law firms, insolvency estates, investors, and claimants to pursue litigation and arbitration strategies that might otherwise be financially difficult or strategically inefficient.

The firms recognized in this ranking represent a mix of global legal finance platforms, institutional legal-assets investors, established dispute funders, and specialist litigation finance firms. This mix is intentional. A credible litigation finance ranking requires the authority of large global funders, but a commercially useful HNW Ranking article also benefits from including independent and specialist funders with clearer recognition-license plausibility.

The ranking does not represent legal advice, investment advice, performance measurement, or endorsement. Tier classifications reflect relative institutional positioning, funding relevance, operational visibility, and specialist role within the litigation finance sector.

As litigation costs rise and disputes become more complex, funders with capital discipline, legal underwriting expertise, transparent governance, and cross-border dispute capability are expected to remain important participants in commercial litigation, international arbitration, collective redress, IP litigation, insolvency disputes, and legal-risk finance.

---

Recognition

Organizations included in the Ranking News Top 20 Litigation Finance Firms 2026 ranking may request information regarding authorized use of the Ranking News designation for marketing and communications purposes.

Recognized institutions may reference the designation in:

• corporate websites
• investor communications
• marketing materials
• client presentations

Licensing inquiries:
[email protected]