Top 30 Boutique Asset Managers for Private Wealth 2026

This report forms part of the Wealth Ranking Private Wealth series, which evaluates specialist investment managers, independent wealth institutions, family-office platforms, private-market access providers, and related organizations serving high-net-worth and sophisticated private investors.

Boutique asset managers occupy an increasingly important position between large universal financial groups and highly concentrated single-strategy funds. In this ranking, “boutique” refers principally to a specialist investment identity, focused ownership or operating model, and a clearly distinguishable investment franchise; it does not imply that every selected firm is small.

The category is centered on specialist private-markets and alternative-investment platforms because these firms are playing a growing role in private wealth portfolios. Family offices, private banks, independent advisers, and qualified individual investors are seeking access to private equity, private credit, infrastructure, real assets, secondaries, co-investments, and diversified private-market portfolios that were historically designed mainly for institutions.

The strongest managers combine investment selection, portfolio construction, manager access, underwriting, liquidity planning, operational infrastructure, and wealth-channel support. Some invest directly, some construct portfolios across external managers, and some provide regulated access architecture. The common requirement is meaningful investment responsibility and sustained relevance to sophisticated private capital.

This ranking identifies specialist organizations with durable importance to the private wealth investment ecosystem rather than comparing short-term fund returns. Large universal banks and broadly diversified asset-management conglomerates were generally de-emphasized where their private-market capability could not be evaluated as a distinct specialist franchise.

Market Overview

Private markets have moved from a satellite allocation toward a more established component of sophisticated private portfolios. The shift reflects demand for differentiated sources of return, income, inflation sensitivity, and exposure to companies and assets that remain outside public markets for longer. It also reflects the growing institutionalization of family offices and independent wealth advisers.

Access is broadening through feeder funds, interval funds, evergreen vehicles, European long-term investment structures, managed accounts, digital subscription systems, and partnerships between managers and private banks. These structures reduce some of the administrative barriers associated with capital calls, tax documentation, manager selection, and minimum commitments, although they do not remove the underlying illiquidity of private assets.

Private credit remains a major allocation theme, but the market is becoming more discriminating. Higher base rates have supported headline yields while also increasing pressure on borrowers. Wealth investors therefore need to distinguish between contractual income and economically sustainable income, paying close attention to leverage, covenant quality, sponsor behavior, collateral, non-accruals, valuation policy, and recovery capability.

Secondaries have become an important portfolio-construction tool. They can provide exposure to more mature assets, improve vintage diversification, accelerate deployment, and create liquidity for existing holders. Yet manager skill remains critical because transaction structure, asset quality, unfunded commitments, continuation vehicles, and pricing dispersion can materially alter the risk profile.

Infrastructure and real assets are also receiving greater attention. Digital infrastructure, power generation, grid modernization, transport, social infrastructure, timberland, agriculture, and energy-transition assets can provide long-duration cash flows, but they carry regulatory, construction, operating, political, and valuation risks that require specialist underwriting.

The expansion of private wealth distribution has raised the operational standard expected of boutique managers. Investment capability alone is insufficient. Firms increasingly need intermediary education, suitability controls, jurisdiction-specific structures, reliable reporting, cybersecurity, valuation governance, and the capacity to explain illiquidity without presenting private assets as substitutes for daily dealing funds.

Industry Trend — 2026

The defining private-markets issue in 2026 is the interaction between wider access and tighter scrutiny. Wealth channels continue to seek alternatives, but slower exits, longer holding periods, valuation uncertainty, and pressure in parts of private credit have made liquidity management more visible. Managers are being judged not only on how they deploy capital but also on how they finance, value, monitor, and ultimately realize investments.

Evergreen and semi-liquid structures remain central to private wealth expansion. Their continuous subscription model, invested portfolios, and simplified administration can be useful for long-term allocation. However, periodic redemption features are conditional rather than equivalent to public-market liquidity. Redemption queues, asset-liability matching, cash buffers, borrowing facilities, and fair treatment between entering, remaining, and exiting investors have therefore become core governance questions.

The secondary market continues to benefit from institutional portfolio rebalancing, delayed distributions, fund extensions, and demand for liquidity solutions. This supports established specialists as well as newer data-enabled firms. It also requires disciplined separation between attractive seasoned exposure and portfolios whose apparent discount compensates for weak assets, concentrated risk, or large remaining commitments.

Private credit is moving from rapid asset gathering toward a fuller test of underwriting. Borrower stress, refinancing needs, documentation quality, payment-in-kind income, sponsor support, and recovery processes are becoming more important as portfolios season. Managers with direct origination, sector expertise, conservative leverage, and workout capability are better positioned than firms relying primarily on market growth.

Technology is changing both access and supervision. Digital onboarding, automated document processing, portfolio look-through, data aggregation, and investor reporting can reduce friction for advisers and family offices. Artificial intelligence can assist document review and monitoring, but incomplete private-company data and manager-reported valuations make human oversight and data provenance especially important.

Wealth distributors are also moving from isolated product selection toward portfolio-level alternatives programs. Advisers increasingly require pacing models, liquidity budgets, vintage planning, exposure mapping, tax coordination, and consolidated reporting across multiple private-market strategies. This favors managers capable of integrating products into a broader private wealth allocation rather than selling a single vehicle in isolation.

Geographic diversification is widening, but access remains uneven. North American private credit and private equity retain substantial scale; European managers benefit from expanding long-term fund structures and established private banking channels; Switzerland remains influential in cross-border wealth management; and Asia-Pacific platforms are developing regional access for family offices and qualified investors.

The strongest boutique managers in 2026 therefore combine specialization with institutional discipline. Their advantage is not simply smaller size or exclusivity. It is the ability to offer a coherent investment proposition, differentiated access, transparent governance, and operational support appropriate to investors whose liquidity needs, tax circumstances, and advisory relationships differ from those of large pension funds.

2026 market consideration	Importance for private wealth investors	Institutional capability required
Evergreen and semi-liquid structures	Broaden access but can create a mismatch between periodic redemptions and illiquid underlying assets	Liquidity budgets, redemption governance, cash management, valuation discipline, and clear investor communication
Slower private-equity exits	Extend holding periods and reduce distributions available for new commitments	Pacing analysis, secondary-market capability, continuation-vehicle review, and portfolio-level cash-flow planning
Private-credit stress	High contractual yields may conceal weaker coverage, refinancing pressure, or aggressive income recognition	Direct underwriting, covenant monitoring, non-accrual reporting, restructuring expertise, and conservative valuation
Growth of secondaries	Can improve deployment and vintage diversification while creating complex asset-selection questions	Portfolio look-through, pricing models, unfunded-commitment analysis, and transaction structuring
Wealth-channel product expansion	Introduces private assets to investors with different liquidity, tax, and information requirements	Intermediary education, suitability controls, jurisdictional structuring, and scalable client service
Infrastructure investment demand	Provides long-duration exposure but carries operating, regulatory, construction, and political risks	Asset-level underwriting, technical expertise, scenario analysis, and active ownership
Valuation transparency	Manager-reported marks affect subscriptions, redemptions, fees, and portfolio decisions	Independent controls, consistent methodology, timely data, auditability, and conflict management
Digital access platforms	Reduce administrative friction but add technology, data, and dependency risks	Secure onboarding, integrated reporting, operational resilience, and regulated distribution architecture
Portfolio-level alternatives programs	Require coordination across strategies, vintages, managers, and liquidity horizons	Allocation design, commitment pacing, exposure aggregation, and consolidated reporting
Cross-border distribution	Expands the investor base while increasing regulatory, tax, currency, and documentation complexity	Local structures, compliance coverage, multilingual service, and experienced distribution partnerships
Artificial-intelligence infrastructure	Creates opportunities across data centers, power, software, and connectivity but can concentrate thematic exposure	Technical diligence, supply-chain mapping, power-market analysis, and portfolio concentration controls
Investor education	Private assets can be misunderstood when marketed using public-market language	Balanced risk disclosure, adviser training, expectation management, and long-term suitability assessment

The relevant distinction is therefore not between traditional and digital distribution, or between closed-end and evergreen funds. Leading firms use the structure appropriate to the underlying assets and investor base while preserving underwriting discipline, realistic liquidity expectations, and accountability for portfolio outcomes.

Methodology — Core Eligibility Criteria

To ensure structural consistency within the category, firms considered for this ranking were evaluated according to the following eligibility conditions:

• Operates as an independent or clearly identifiable specialist investment manager, private-markets firm, multi-manager platform, or regulated private-market access provider
• Maintains meaningful relevance to family offices, private banks, independent advisers, qualified individual investors, or other sophisticated private wealth channels
• Provides investment management, portfolio construction, manager selection, direct investing, secondaries, co-investment, private credit, infrastructure, real assets, or closely related alternative-investment capability
• Demonstrates a publicly traceable operating platform, investment team, governance structure, and continuing activity during the 2026 evaluation period
• Possesses sufficient scale, track record, specialist authority, manager access, origination capability, or platform maturity to support sustained private-market investing
• Maintains operational, valuation, reporting, compliance, and risk processes appropriate to illiquid or semi-liquid investment strategies
• Offers more than passive product distribution by exercising meaningful investment selection, portfolio responsibility, underwriting, due diligence, or access-platform governance
• Retains a specialist identity distinguishable from a universal bank, mass-market brokerage, conventional long-only fund complex, or undifferentiated financial conglomerate

Large universal banks, conventional retail fund sponsors, managers without meaningful private wealth relevance, pure placement agents, software-only providers, inactive firms, and single-family offices without an external investment platform were excluded or de-emphasized.

Methodology — Ranking Factors

Firms included in the ranking were evaluated using a combination of qualitative and structural considerations. Key factors include:

• Strength and clarity of the specialist investment identity
• Relevance to private wealth, family-office, private-bank, and adviser-led distribution channels
• Longevity and resilience across fundraising, credit, liquidity, and economic cycles
• Breadth and depth across private equity, private credit, infrastructure, real assets, secondaries, co-investments, and portfolio solutions
• Quality of sourcing, manager selection, underwriting, portfolio construction, and investment monitoring
• Ability to provide differentiated access rather than duplicating widely available public-market exposure
• Institutional credibility among investors, intermediaries, counterparties, and professional advisers
• Suitability of investment structures for the intended investor base
• Valuation governance, liquidity management, transparency, reporting, and conflict controls
• Technology, onboarding, administration, cybersecurity, and data infrastructure
• International reach and capacity to support cross-border private wealth relationships
• Stability of ownership, leadership, investment culture, and succession
• Distinctiveness within direct investing, multi-manager portfolios, private credit, secondaries, real assets, or access infrastructure
• Current organizational development and continued relevance during the 2026 evaluation period
• Long-term influence on the expansion of institutional-quality private-market investing within private wealth

The objective is to identify firms with sustained structural relevance rather than to compare short-term fund performance. Publicly reported returns were considered only as contextual evidence of continuity and were not used as a mechanical ranking variable.

The ranking universe consisted of approximately 120 specialist private-market managers, boutique alternative-investment firms, multi-manager organizations, and private wealth access platforms, from which 30 institutions were selected.

Tier classifications reflect relative institutional positioning and do not represent investment recommendations, performance rankings, or endorsements of any fund, manager, security, or investment product.

---

Tier I — Leading Boutique and Specialist Private Wealth Investment Platforms

Hamilton Lane

• Headquarters: Conshohocken, United States
• Founded: 1991

Hamilton Lane is a global private-markets investment firm with capabilities across primaries, secondaries, direct equity, direct credit, infrastructure, real assets, venture and growth, customized portfolios, and investment technology. Its specialist identity is built around private markets rather than a universal financial-services model.

The firm has developed a substantial private wealth business through evergreen funds and other vehicles designed for advisers and qualified investors. Its multi-manager approach, proprietary data, global manager relationships, and portfolio-construction infrastructure allow clients to obtain diversified exposure across strategies, vintages, and geographies.

Hamilton Lane fits Tier I because it combines specialist scale, institutional depth, visible private wealth commitment, and broad implementation capability. Its position at the intersection of investment management, data, and wealth-channel product design makes it a reference platform for this category.

Partners Group

• Headquarters: Baar, Switzerland
• Founded: 1996

Partners Group is a global private-markets firm investing across private equity, private credit, infrastructure, real estate, and portfolio solutions. It combines direct investment capability with an international client platform serving institutions, family offices, private banks, advisers, and individual investors.

The firm has been an early and influential developer of evergreen private-market vehicles. These structures provide an already invested portfolio and periodic subscription or redemption mechanisms, while still requiring investors to accept limits arising from the illiquid nature of the underlying assets.

Partners Group fits Tier I because of its scale, Swiss private wealth connectivity, direct investment platform, and long-standing influence on private-market access. The liquidity scrutiny surrounding evergreen structures in 2026 reinforces, rather than reduces, the importance of its platform to the category’s development and governance debate.

Ardian

• Headquarters: Paris, France
• Founded: 1996

Ardian is an independent private-investment firm with major capabilities in secondaries and primaries, buyouts, growth, infrastructure, real estate, private credit, co-investments, and customized solutions. Its European heritage is supported by a broad international office and investor network.

The firm maintains a dedicated Private Wealth Solutions activity serving private investors and wealth managers through feeder partnerships, evergreen strategies, and institutional private-client relationships. Its secondaries expertise is particularly relevant to wealth portfolios seeking mature exposure and improved diversification across managers and vintages.

Ardian fits Tier I because it combines global private-market authority with a clearly developed private wealth proposition. Its investment breadth, secondaries franchise, wealth-management partnerships, and continuing independence give it a distinctive position among large specialist firms.

StepStone Group

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2007

StepStone Group is a global private-markets investment firm operating across private equity, private debt, real estate, infrastructure, venture and growth, fund investments, secondaries, co-investments, direct investments, advisory, and data services.

Its private wealth platform offers evergreen strategies across diversified private markets, venture and growth, infrastructure, private credit, and private equity. The model combines manager research, portfolio construction, deal sourcing, adviser support, and operational structures intended to make institutional private-market strategies usable within wealth portfolios.

StepStone fits Tier I because its private wealth activity is a substantial, purpose-built extension of a broad specialist platform. Its research network, asset-class coverage, international distribution, and ability to connect portfolio analytics with implementation establish strong category leadership.

HarbourVest Partners

• Headquarters: Boston, United States
• Founded: 1982

HarbourVest Partners is an independent global private-markets firm with more than four decades of experience across primary fund investments, secondaries, direct co-investments, infrastructure, real assets, and private credit.

Its diversified model is well suited to wealth investors that require exposure across managers, strategies, vintages, sectors, and regions rather than a concentrated commitment to a single sponsor. The firm serves financial intermediaries and individual investors alongside its long-established institutional client base.

HarbourVest fits Tier I because of its independence, longevity, manager relationships, and authority in diversified private-market portfolio construction. Its combination of primaries, secondaries, and direct investing makes it one of the clearest specialist anchors for private wealth alternatives.

---

Tier II — Established Boutique and Specialist Private Wealth Investment Firms

(Alphabetical order)

Adams Street Partners

• Headquarters: Chicago, United States
• Founded: 1972

Adams Street Partners is an employee-owned global private-markets manager investing across primary funds, secondaries, growth equity, venture capital, private credit, and co-investments. Its long operating history provides experience across multiple fundraising, valuation, and exit cycles.

The firm offers private wealth solutions for advisers, wealth platforms, and qualified investors seeking diversified access to institutional private markets. Its global manager network and multi-strategy structure support portfolio construction across stages and vintages.

Adams Street fits Tier II because of its specialist ownership model, investment breadth, institutional heritage, and clear engagement with adviser-led private wealth distribution. It provides a durable multi-manager alternative to both universal asset managers and single-strategy boutiques.

Capital Dynamics

• Headquarters: Zug, Switzerland
• Founded: 1988

Capital Dynamics is an independent private-asset manager focused on mid-market private equity, private credit, clean-energy infrastructure, and private-market portfolio solutions. Its international platform retains a specialist identity centered on private assets.

The firm’s capabilities are relevant to private wealth investors seeking exposure across corporate private markets and infrastructure. Its clean-energy activity adds access to operating assets and transition-related opportunities that differ from conventional buyout and direct-lending portfolios.

Capital Dynamics fits Tier II because of its Swiss base, long history, international reach, and differentiated mix of equity, credit, and clean-energy infrastructure. Its focused platform is substantial without losing the specialist character central to this ranking.

Coller Capital

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 1990

Coller Capital is a specialist investor in the secondary market for private assets. The firm acquires interests in private-equity and private-credit portfolios and has played an influential role in the institutional development of secondaries.

Its private wealth activity provides education and investment structures focused on secondaries for financial advisers and qualified private investors. This is relevant as wealth portfolios seek faster deployment, seasoned assets, and diversification beyond new closed-end commitments.

Coller Capital fits Tier II because it combines category-defining secondaries expertise with a dedicated private wealth proposition. Its institutional standing, specialist focus, and wealth-channel development make it a strong established-tier firm in this category.

Golub Capital

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 1994

Golub Capital is a specialist credit asset manager known principally for direct lending to middle-market companies. Its strategies include senior and one-loan debt structures, broadly syndicated loans, and other credit solutions developed through long-standing sponsor and borrower relationships.

Private credit has become a significant income allocation for family offices and wealth platforms, making Golub’s underwriting, portfolio monitoring, and origination capabilities relevant beyond its institutional base. The specialist focus also provides a clear investment identity.

Golub Capital fits Tier II because of its scale, longevity, middle-market credit authority, and relevance to the private wealth expansion of direct lending. Its inclusion recognizes a leading specialist rather than treating private credit as a generic component of a diversified alternatives group.

ICG

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 1989

ICG is a global alternative asset manager with strategies across structured capital, private debt, private equity, real assets, secondaries, and credit. Although large and publicly listed, it retains a distinct specialist identity separate from universal banking.

Its private wealth relevance is supported by strategies and structures designed for wealth-management channels seeking income, private-company exposure, and diversified alternatives. ICG’s European credit heritage also broadens a market often dominated by U.S. direct-lending firms.

ICG fits Tier II because of its institutional scale, specialist investment culture, international distribution, and increasing connection to private wealth. Its breadth is substantial, but its franchise remains focused enough to be evaluated within this category.

LGT Capital Partners

• Headquarters: Pfäffikon, Switzerland
• Founded: 1998

LGT Capital Partners is a global alternative-investment manager specializing in private markets, multi-manager portfolios, private equity, private credit, hedge funds, and insurance-linked strategies. It operates within the wider LGT Group, owned by the Princely House of Liechtenstein.

The platform has natural relevance to private wealth through LGT’s private banking and family-office relationships. It provides manager selection, diversified portfolios, secondaries, co-investments, and thematic strategies for investors seeking institutional implementation across alternatives.

LGT Capital Partners fits Tier II because its Swiss-Liechtenstein identity, multi-manager depth, and connection to sophisticated private clients distinguish it from institutional-only firms. Its governance model and long-duration ownership further support its established position.

Northleaf Capital Partners

• Headquarters: Toronto, Canada
• Founded: 2009

Northleaf Capital Partners is a global private-markets investment firm with capabilities across private equity, private credit, and infrastructure. Its present independent platform developed from a private-markets program with roots extending to 2001.

The firm serves institutions, family offices, and private wealth intermediaries seeking mid-market and diversified private-asset exposure. Its three principal asset-class franchises allow investors to combine growth, income, and long-duration real-asset strategies within one specialist relationship.

Northleaf fits Tier II because of its Canadian heritage, international office network, balanced private-markets platform, and relevance to family-office capital. It adds geographic breadth while maintaining strong institutional credibility.

Pantheon

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 1982

Pantheon is a global private-markets investment manager with capabilities across private equity, private credit, infrastructure, real assets, primaries, secondaries, co-investments, and customized portfolios.

Its private wealth platform gives advisers and eligible investors access to diversified private-market strategies through structures adapted to wealth channels. Decades of manager relationships and portfolio data support selection across strategies, regions, and vintages.

Pantheon fits Tier II because of its longevity, multi-manager authority, broad private-market coverage, and explicit private wealth proposition. Its experience constructing diversified portfolios makes it particularly relevant as advisers move from individual alternative products toward integrated programs.

Pemberton Asset Management

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2013

Pemberton Asset Management is a specialist European private-credit manager providing financing to mid-sized companies. Its strategies span senior lending, strategic credit, working-capital finance, risk-sharing, and other forms of corporate credit.

The platform is relevant to wealth investors seeking income-oriented exposure outside the dominant U.S. lending market. Its regional origination network and corporate focus allow private clients to access European borrowers through a specialist underwriting organization.

Pemberton fits Tier II because of its scale, European sourcing capability, focused credit identity, and growing relevance to wealth-channel alternatives. Its inclusion provides an important regional counterweight within the private-credit segment.

Tikehau Capital

• Headquarters: Paris, France
• Founded: 2004

Tikehau Capital is a global alternative asset manager with capabilities across private debt, real assets, private equity, capital-markets strategies, and multi-asset solutions. The firm has expanded internationally while retaining an entrepreneurial European identity.

Its strategies are increasingly accessible through private banks, advisers, and wealth-management channels. Private debt and real assets are especially relevant to private clients seeking income, diversification, and exposure to long-term investment themes.

Tikehau fits Tier II because of its specialist heritage, private-debt authority, international reach, and applicability to private wealth portfolios. Its diversified alternatives platform is broader than a single-strategy boutique but remains distinct from a universal asset manager.

---

Tier III — Specialist Investment and Private Wealth Access Platforms

(Alphabetical order)

Clipway

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2023

Clipway is a private-equity secondaries firm focused on diversified portfolios of private-market interests, principally in North America and Western Europe. Its team combines established secondaries experience with a data-oriented underwriting approach.

The strategy is relevant to private wealth portfolios seeking seasoned exposure, vintage diversification, and potentially earlier distributions than new blind-pool commitments. The firm’s technology emphasis may also improve the screening of fragmented transaction sets.

Clipway fits Tier III because it is a young but clearly specialized secondaries platform with credible professional foundations. Its shorter organizational history makes specialist-tier placement more appropriate than established-tier recognition.

Comvest Partners

• Headquarters: West Palm Beach, United States
• Founded: 2000

Comvest Partners is a private-investment firm focused on middle-market private equity and private credit. It provides capital through buyouts, growth investments, direct lending, and related financing strategies.

The combination of equity and credit allows investors to obtain exposure to different parts of the middle-market capital structure. Its sponsor relationships and underwriting experience are relevant to family offices and private investment platforms allocating to specialist alternatives.

Comvest fits Tier III because it has a durable investment franchise and meaningful scale, while its public private wealth identity is less developed than that of the firms placed in Tier II. Specialist-tier placement recognizes investment substance without overstating distribution prominence.

Connection Capital

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2010

Connection Capital is a private-investment platform providing its client network with access to private equity, private debt, property, and alternative opportunities. It sources, evaluates, structures, and monitors investments for private investors.

Its model is directly aligned with wealth clients who want selective private-market exposure without building a full internal investment office. The platform combines professional due diligence with deal-by-deal or portfolio access.

Connection Capital fits Tier III because its UK private-investor focus and access model are highly relevant to the category. Its more concentrated scale and regional orientation support specialist rather than established-tier placement.

Deerpath Capital

• Headquarters: Fort Lauderdale, United States
• Founded: 2007

Deerpath Capital is a direct-lending manager focused on financing lower middle-market companies, often in partnership with private-equity sponsors. It structures senior secured loans across a diversified group of industries.

The lower middle market can provide differentiated credit exposure beyond the larger borrowers targeted by major direct-lending platforms. It also requires careful documentation, monitoring, and workout capacity because smaller companies may be more sensitive to economic and financing conditions.

Deerpath fits Tier III because of its clear credit specialization, established operating history, and relevance to income-oriented alternative allocations. Its narrower strategy makes specialist-tier positioning appropriate.

Five Arrows

• Headquarters: Paris, France
• Founded: 2009

Five Arrows is Rothschild & Co’s alternative-assets platform, investing across private equity, private credit, and multi-manager strategies in Europe and North America. Its activities commonly focus on middle-market companies and specialist segments of private capital.

The platform benefits from connectivity with a broader network of family offices, entrepreneurs, private-bank clients, and institutional investors. Its range allows sophisticated private investors to access both direct and diversified private-market strategies.

Five Arrows fits Tier III because of its investment depth and private wealth connectivity, while its identity remains linked to the larger Rothschild & Co group rather than operating as a fully independent boutique. The placement recognizes the specialist franchise without overlooking that ownership context.

Hollyport Capital

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2006

Hollyport Capital is a private-equity secondaries manager specializing in mature fund interests, legacy portfolios, and smaller secondary transactions. It provides liquidity to existing holders while acquiring seasoned private-market exposure.

This focus is relevant to private wealth investors interested in portfolios with greater visibility into underlying assets and potentially shorter duration than primary commitments. Smaller and more complex transactions can also offer opportunities outside the most competitive large-cap secondary auctions.

Hollyport fits Tier III because of its focused secondaries expertise, long operating history, and clear portfolio-construction relevance. Its specialist scale and transaction niche distinguish it from larger diversified secondary platforms.

Kline Hill Partners

• Headquarters: Greenwich, United States
• Founded: 2015

Kline Hill Partners is a private-market secondaries firm focused on smaller, fragmented, and often overlooked transactions. It acquires limited-partnership interests and other private-fund positions outside the largest segments of the secondary market.

The strategy can provide diversification away from mega-fund exposure and can address liquidity needs that are uneconomic for the largest buyers. Success depends on granular fund analysis, transaction execution, and disciplined pricing across many smaller positions.

Kline Hill fits Tier III because of its differentiated secondaries identity and relevance to private wealth interest in mature private-market exposure. Its niche specialization supports recognition without requiring the breadth of a Tier II platform.

Moonfare

• Headquarters: Berlin, Germany
• Founded: 2016

Moonfare is a private-market investment platform providing eligible individuals, family offices, and wealth intermediaries with access to private-equity funds, co-investments, secondaries, open-ended strategies, and diversified portfolios.

The firm combines investment screening with feeder structures, digital administration, education, and a secondary-market facility. Its partner offering also allows wealth managers to incorporate private-market access into their own client propositions.

Moonfare fits Tier III because it is not a conventional direct asset manager, yet it exercises meaningful selection and access-platform responsibilities central to modern private wealth distribution. Its German base, international reach, and clear brand make it an important specialist infrastructure participant.

Park Square Capital

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2004

Park Square Capital is a European credit manager focused on senior debt, subordinated debt, and other financing solutions for sponsor-backed and middle-market companies. Its platform spans European and transatlantic corporate credit.

The firm offers exposure to privately originated lending strategies that can complement public fixed income within sophisticated wealth portfolios. Its value depends on sourcing, documentation, portfolio monitoring, and the ability to manage credits through changing economic conditions.

Park Square fits Tier III because of its established credit specialization and institutional standing. Its direct private wealth presence is less visible than that of the established-tier firms, making specialist-tier placement the more measured classification.

Roc Partners

• Headquarters: Sydney, Australia
• Founded: 2014

Roc Partners is an Asia-Pacific private-markets investment manager operating across private equity, private credit, secondaries, and customized investment solutions. Its regional network provides access to opportunities that may be underrepresented in globally diversified portfolios.

Family offices and wealth institutions in Asia-Pacific increasingly require local sourcing, governance knowledge, and manager relationships rather than imported exposure alone. Roc’s strategy mix supports both direct and portfolio-based investment across the region.

Roc Partners fits Tier III because of its geographic specialization, private-market breadth, and relevance to Australian and Asia-Pacific private capital. Its regional scale supports a strong specialist position.

Rockpool Investments

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2011

Rockpool Investments is a UK private-investment firm connecting private investors with equity and credit opportunities in established owner-managed businesses. Its model emphasizes professionally sourced and evaluated direct private-company investments.

The platform is relevant to investors seeking selective exposure beyond public markets and conventional blind-pool funds. It provides transaction access and investment oversight without requiring each participant to maintain a standalone family-office team.

Rockpool fits Tier III because of its direct private-investor orientation, boutique scale, and UK middle-market specialization. These characteristics closely match the category even though its international breadth is more limited than that of the higher-tier firms.

Siguler Guff

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 1991

Siguler Guff is a multi-strategy private-markets investment firm focused on specialist private equity, credit, small business, emerging markets, distressed opportunities, and other less crowded segments.

Its strategy set is relevant to family offices and sophisticated private investors seeking diversification beyond large-cap buyout funds and mainstream direct lending. The firm’s long history provides experience in areas where market access, local knowledge, and manager selection are especially important.

Siguler Guff fits Tier III because of its differentiated investment scope, established platform, and niche private-market authority. Its less conventional strategies add useful breadth to the ranking.

Stafford Capital Partners

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2000

Stafford Capital Partners is an independent private-markets manager and adviser with capabilities in infrastructure, timberland, agriculture, sustainable investment, private-market funds, secondaries, and customized programs.

Its long-duration real-asset strategies are relevant to family offices seeking inflation sensitivity, income, environmental exposure, and diversification from corporate private equity and credit. Its advisory and portfolio-review work also supports investors managing complex legacy programs.

Stafford fits Tier III because of its differentiated natural-capital and infrastructure expertise, international office network, and specialist ownership. Its private wealth distribution is more selective than that of the firms in Tier II, but its investment distinctiveness strongly supports inclusion.

Titanbay

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2019

Titanbay is a private-markets infrastructure and access platform serving wealth managers, private banks, multi-family offices, asset managers, and other intermediaries. It supports the structuring, distribution, operation, and administration of private-market offerings.

Its relevance lies in reducing the operational friction that can prevent wealth platforms from offering institutional private equity, private credit, infrastructure, and multi-manager strategies. Technology, reporting, documentation, and fund architecture are central to this role.

Titanbay fits Tier III because it is primarily an enabling platform rather than a conventional direct manager. Its strong alignment with the mechanics of private wealth access nevertheless makes it a meaningful specialist participant in the category.

White Oak Global Advisors

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2007

White Oak Global Advisors is a private-credit manager focused on financing small and middle-market businesses. Its strategies include direct lending, asset-based lending, equipment finance, working-capital solutions, and other secured credit opportunities.

The platform provides differentiated exposure beyond large sponsor-backed unitranche lending. For private wealth investors, this can broaden the sources of contractual income and collateral, while also increasing the importance of underwriting, servicing, and recovery expertise.

White Oak fits Tier III because of its specialist credit identity, breadth of lending niches, and relevance to alternative income portfolios. Its focused private wealth visibility is more limited than that of the Tier II firms, supporting specialist-tier placement.

---

Remarks

Private-market allocations can provide diversification, income, and access to assets not represented in public portfolios, but they also introduce illiquidity, valuation uncertainty, layered fees, leverage, manager dispersion, and long investment horizons. Greater availability does not make these characteristics disappear.

The institutions recognized in this ranking represent specialist managers and access platforms with sustained relevance to the international private wealth ecosystem. Inclusion reflects organizational positioning, investment capability, and wealth-channel importance rather than an endorsement of any specific product or investment outcome.

The 2026 classification gives particular weight to the quality of underwriting, portfolio construction, secondaries capability, private-credit discipline, liquidity governance, valuation transparency, and the operational infrastructure required to serve qualified private investors responsibly.

Tier classification reflects relative institutional scale, specialist authority, platform maturity, international reach, and private wealth relevance. This ranking does not constitute investment advice, fund-selection advice, private-placement advice, due diligence, or a recommendation to invest with any firm, fund, security, or strategy.

---

Recognition

Organizations included in the Ranking News Top 30 Boutique Asset Managers for Private Wealth 2026 ranking may request information regarding authorized use of the Ranking News designation for marketing and communications purposes.

Recognized institutions may reference the designation in:

• corporate websites
• investor communications
• marketing materials
• client presentations

Ranking inclusion is editorially determined and independent of licensing, advertising, or commercial participation. Recognition-materials licenses govern only the use of official Ranking News / Wealth Ranking assets, approved wording, and related communications materials.

Licensing inquiries:
[email protected]